Philosophical foundations of cultural diversity management

This article analyzes the problem of managing cultural diversity in modern multiethnic societies, that is becoming particularly acute in the context of globalization, intensive migration, and the growth of ethnic pluralism. The author examines the evolution of theoretical approaches – from classical multiculturalism, focused on preserving cultural boundaries, to interculturalism, emphasizing interaction and dialogue, as well as to the Russian concept of polyculturalism and the new paradigm of «cultural diversity management», that shifts the focus from conflict to cooperation and adaptation mechanisms. The article substantiates the need for a multi-level model of integration policy, including the macrolevel (government legislation, antidiscrimination measures, political representation, and institutional frameworks), the mesolevel (regional and municipal practices, the creation of public spaces for dialogue, the adaptation of social services), and the microlevel (civil society institutions, interpersonal interaction, digital platforms that form new communication channels). Particular attention is paid to the Russian context. The study reveals a shift in conflicts from the vertical « center-regions» plane to the horizontal plane of intergroup relations in cities, that requires new approaches to urban policy. Key issues include the tension between the recognition of cultural differences and social justice, the lack of coordination between levels of government, hidden assimilation under the guise of cultural sensitivity. Based on a comparative analysis of international experience and Russian practices, philosophical foundations for effective integration are formulated, based on dialogic universalism, mutual recognition, and the transformation of cultural differences from a barrier into a resource for social development. A conclusion is drawn about the potential of a cultural diversity management concept focused on cooperation, civic participation, and institutional flexibility, opening up opportunities for developing adaptive integration strategies in the context of today’s “superdiversity”.

1. Platon. Republic. Moscow: Academic Project; 2022:398 (in Russian).

2. Aristotel’. Politics. Moscow: Azbooka; 2024:352 (in Russian). 3. Kant I. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Moscow: URSS; 2024:200 (in Russian).

3. Spehar A. Governing Diversity at the Frontline: The Dual Logics of Cultural Sensitivity and Assimilation in Sweden. Nordic Welfare Research. 2025;10(4):1–16.

4. Taylor Ch. Multiculturalism and “The Politics of Recognition”. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1992:92.

5. Habermas J. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2005:352.

6. Byazrova D.B., Tedeeva V.K. Multiculturalism and Polyculturalism as Models for Optimizing Interethnic Communication. State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2022;1:158–162 (in Russian).

7. Buber M. I and You. Moscow: AST; 2024:192 (in Russian).

8. Bogatova O.A., Dolgaeva E.I. Ethnocultural Policy in the Region: Integration of Institutional Factors in the Formation of Interethnic Relations. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2011;1:196–210 (in Russian).

9. Pain E.A. Managing Cultural Diversity: Historical Models and Contemporary Practice in the Regulation of Ethnopolitical Relations. Public Administration Issues. 2017;4:77–102 (in Russian).

10. Levinas E. Totality and Infinity. Moscow: University press; 2000:416 (in Russian).

11. Mansouri F., Elias A. Pluralist diversity governance: deepening the multiculturalism-interculturalism nexus. Comparative Migration Studies. 2025;13(23):1–19.

12. Abbas H.S.M., Xu X., Zhang L. Multi-Ethnic Integration for Social Inclusiveness: State Strategies for Sustainable Development and Well-Being in the Global North and South. Sustainable Development. 2025; 33(6):1–18.

13. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Moscow: Lenand; 2017:536 (in Russian).

14. Hegel G.W.F. Phenomenology of Spirit. Moscow: AST Publishers; 2021: 180. (in Russian).

15. Nechaeva E.L., Kayupova F.M. Communication strategies in multi-ethnic societies: a comparative analysis of the approaches of Kazakhstan and Russia. Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Political Science. 2025;151(2):9–21.

16. Sehgal R., Soni S. Local Government Approaches to Migrant Integration, Multiculturalism, and Social Cohesion in Urban Areas. Lex localis. Journal of Local Self-Government. 2025; 23(S1):190–194.

17. Arendt H. Vita Activa, or On Active Life. Saint Petersburg: Aletheia; 2000: 437 (in Russian).

18. Gadzhiev Kh.A. Intercultural Dialogue in the Digital Space as a Factor of Socio-Political Stability. Sociopolitical Sciences. 2023;13(4):49–54 (in Russian).

19. Baudrillard J. Simulacra and Simulation. Moscow: Postum; 2015:241 (in Russian).

20. Tishkov V.A. Unity in Diversity: Publications from the Journal “Etnopanorama” 1999–2011. Orenburg: Publishing Center of the Orenburg State Agrarian University; 2011:232 (in Russian).

21. Benhabib S. The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2002:280.

22. Foucault M. Disciplinary Power. Moscow: Ad Marginem; 1999:480 (in Russian).

23. Hobsbawm E. The Invention of Tradition. Acta Eurasica. 2000;1:47–62 (in Russian).