Preview

Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Pedagogics. Psychology. Philosophy

Advanced search

The role of the social context of advertising in the perception of AI-generated images among consumers with different decision-making styles

https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-5604-2026-3-108-122

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to produce advertising images, yet consumer responses depend not only on the use of AI but also on what the image depicts and on the audience; the role of the ad’s social context and of consumer decision-making styles is underexplored. The aim was to examine how the social context of an ad image (a person versus a product only) and its origin (AI-generated versus traditional) relate to ad evaluations among consumers with different decision-making styles. Materials and methods: an online survey of 150 respondents (mostly aged 18–26); styles were measured with the Consumer Style Inventory adapted by O. I. Patosha and N. V. Antonova; four ads of a fictitious chocolate brand (AIgenerated/ real × product/person) were rated on attitude, trust, purchase intention and perceived authenticity (Wilcoxon test, Spearman correlations). Results: product-only ads were rated higher than ads with a person regardless of origin; in the “person” pair the AI image outperformed the photograph on all measures, in the “product” pair the real photo scored higher on trust and authenticity; only 24% recognised the real image with a person. The “brand, novelty and fashion”, “recreational shopping” and “quality-conscious” styles were positively related to product ads, including AI-generated ones; “brand loyalty” – to ads with a person regardless of origin; “impulsiveness” and “price-conscious” – negatively to images with a person. Social context is thus no less important than image origin. The findings can inform targeted advertising with generative AI; experimental and cross-cultural studies are needed.

About the Authors

G. S. Nozhkina
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

NOZHKINA Galina Sergeevna – psychologist in independent practice

Moscow



V. A. Baranova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

BARANOVA Victoria Anatolyevna – Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Associate Professor, Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology

Moscow



References

1. Folomeeva T.V. Socio-psychological approach to the study of consumer behaviour. Lomonosov Psychology Journal. 2012;(1):45–58 (in Russian).

2. Soldatova G.U., Chigarkova S.V., Ilyukhina S.N. Technologically extended personality: development and validation of the digital everyday life self-management scale. Lomonosov Psychology Journal. 2024;47(2):175–200 (in Russian).

3. Shirkov Yu.E. Practical directions of socio-psychological work in advertising. In: Zhukov YuM, Petrovskaya LA, Solovieva OV. (eds.) Introduction to practical social psychology. Moscow: Smysl; 1999:185–200 (in Russian).

4. Cillo P., Rubera G. Generative AI in innovation and marketing processes: A roadmap of research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2025;53:684–701. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-024- 01044-7

5. Klein A., Sharma V.M. Consumer decision-making styles, involvement, and the intention to participate in online group buying. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2022;64:102808. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102808

6. Antonova N.V., Patosha O.I. Brand perception by people with different consumer behaviour strategies. Social Psychology and Society. 2018;9(1):124–143 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17759/sps.2018090109

7. Bogomolova N.N. Social psychology of mass communication. Moscow: Aspekt Press; 2010:191 (in Russian).

8. Wang Q., Yao X., Li X., Yan X., Li R. When peripheral route meets central route: An elaboration likelihood model of sales performance in live commerce. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2025;84:104218. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104218

9. Hassanein K., Head M. Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2007;65(8):689–708. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.018

10. Torbarina M., Kolar T. Paying Attention to Faces: Dual Function of the Face in Advertisement. In: Proceedings of the 52nd EMAC Annual Conference, Bucharest, May 28-31, 2024. Bucharest: European Marketing Academy; 2024. Article 119625.

11. Yablonskikh AV, Ferezanova SA. Current trends and the impact of AI on visual selling content in marketing communications. Economy and Business: Theory and Practice. 2026;(2):281–286 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24412/2411-0450-2026-2-281-286

12. Hartmann J., Exner Y., Domdey S. The power of generative marketing: Can generative AI create superhuman visual marketing content? International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2025;42(1):13–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.09.002

13. Horgby L.E.E., Galizzi D. A.I. vs. Human: Ad Creator Influence – How Ad Creators Shape Consumer Responses and Acceptance of AI in Advertising: Master’s thesis. Jönköping: Jönköping University; 2024. Available at: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1870682 (accessed: 25 February 2026]

14. Bui H.T., Filimonau V., Sezerel H. AI-thenticity: Exploring the effect of perceived authenticity of AIgenerated visual content on tourist patronage intentions. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management. 2024;34:100956. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2024.100956

15. Gu C., Jia S., Lai J., et al. Exploring consumer acceptance of AI-generated advertisements: From the perspectives of perceived eeriness and perceived intelligence. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2024;19(3):2218–2238. DOI: 10.3390/jtaer19030108

16. Wu L., Wen T.J. Understanding AI advertising from the consumer perspective: What factors determine consumer appreciation of AI-created advertisements? Journal of Advertising Research. 2021;61(2):133– 146. DOI: 10.2501/JAR-2021-004

17. Chen Y., Wang H., Rao Hill S., Li B. Consumer attitudes toward AI-generated ads: Appeal types, self-efficacy and AI’s social role. Journal of Business Research. 2024;185:114867. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114867

18. Osińska A., Bazylewska E., Grala M., et al. AI Images vs. Real Photographs: Investigating Visual Recognition and Perception. Applied Sciences. 2025;18(6):61. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12641808/ (accessed: 20 February 2026].

19. Peng Y., Zhang H., Liu S., et al. Crafting Synthetic Realities: Examining Visual Realism and Misinformation Potential of Photorealistic AI-Generated Images. arXiv; 2025. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17484 (accessed: 20 February 2026).


Review

For citations:


Nozhkina G.S., Baranova V.A. The role of the social context of advertising in the perception of AI-generated images among consumers with different decision-making styles. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Pedagogics. Psychology. Philosophy. 2026;(3):108-122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-5604-2026-3-108-122

Views: 4

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5604 (Online)