Corpus technologies in studying cultural concepts in RFL classes: The concept of happiness
https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-5604-2026-3-72-83
Abstract
The integration of digital language resources into the practice of teaching Russian as a foreign language (RFL) opens up new opportunities for developing linguocultural competence in foreign students. The National Corpus of the Russian Language (NCRL) is a unique repository of authentic texts of various genres and styles, but its didactic potential in studying cultural concepts remains insufficiently explored. The problem lies in the absence of methodologically grounded approaches to using the NCRL and related corpus tools (AntConc, Sketch Engine, OpenCorpora) for systematic work with key concepts of Russian culture in a foreign-language audience. The aim of the article is to develop and experimentally verify a methodology for using corpus technologies in studying the concept of HAPPINESS by foreign students at level B2. The research methods include theoretical analysis of scientific literature on conceptology and RFL methodology, corpus analysis (frequency, collocational, contextual), pedagogical experiment with 58 students, questionnaires, and statistical data processing (Student’s t-test, Cohen’s coefficient). The results showed a statistically significant advantage of the experimental group trained according to the author’s methodology using corpus technologies over the control group following the traditional program: the final increase was 34.4 points versus 14.5 (t(56) = 11.42, p < 0.001, d = 3.04). The most pronounced effect was recorded in the formation of corpus-information skills (an increase of 11.9 points) and linguocultural competence (an increase of 8.7 points). The conclusions confirm that the systematic use of corpus technologies ensures a deep understanding of cultural concepts, the development of research skills, and sustained motivation to learn RFL. The proposed methodology can be implemented in curricula for Russian as a foreign language at level B2.
About the Author
L. A. KosarevaRussian Federation
KOSAREVA Larisa Anatolyevna – Cand. Sci. (Philology), Associate Professor, Department of Russian Language No. 3, Institute of the Russian Language
Moscow
References
1. Vorobyev V.V. Linguoculturology. Moscow: RUDN Publ., 2016:386 (in Russian).
2. Prokhorov Yu.E. National Sociocultural Stereotypes of Speech Behaviour and Their Role in Teaching Russian as a Foreign Language. Moscow: Flinta Publ., 2018:240 (in Russian).
3. Zolotov P.Yu. Linguodidactic properties of corpus technologies. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2020:25(185):75–82 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20310/1810-0201-2020-25-185-75-82.
4. Lebedeva M.Yu., Obukhova T.M. The use of corpus technologies in the Russian as a foreign language writing course. Teacher education in Russia. 2024: (4):98–105 (in Russian).
5. Friginal E., Dye P.S., Nolen M. Corpus-Based Approaches in Language Teaching: Outcomes, Observations, and Teacher Perspectives. Boğaziçi University Journal of Education. 2020:37(1):53–68.
6. McEnery T., Clarke I., Brookes G. Learner Language, Discourse and Interaction: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2025:280.
7. Stepanov Yu.S. Constants: A Dictionary of Russian Culture. Moscow: Academic Project, 2004:992 (in Russian).
8. Stepanov Yu.S. Constants: A Dictionary of Russian Culture. Moscow: Academic Project, 2004:992 (in Russian).
9. Kolesov V.V. Language and Mentality. Saint Petersburg: St. Petersburg Oriental Studies. 2002:512 (in Russian).
10. Vorkachev S.G. Happiness as a Linguocultural Concept. Moscow: Gnozis; 2007:192 (in Russian).
11. Shaklein V.M. Linguoculturological approach in teaching RFL: content and methods. Russian language abroad. 2012:(1):15–22 (in Russian).
12. Wierzbicka A. Language. Culture. Cognition. Moscow: Russian dictionaries; 1997:416 (in Russian).
13. Zaliznyak A.A., Levontina I.B., Shmelev A.D. Constants and Variables of the Russian Linguistic Worldview. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures, 2012:432 (in Russian).
14. Kharitonova O.V. Information technologies in teaching RFL: current state and prospects. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2024:(2):31–42 (in Russian).
15. Levinson A.I. Using the Russian National Corpus in teaching Russian to foreign students specializing in economics and finance. In: Russian National Corpus and Problems of Humanitarian Education: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Moscow: HSE Publ.; 2007:210–218 (in Russian).
16. Fidchuk M.Yu. Multimedia Russian corpus of the National Corpus of the Russian Language as a component of an authentic environment for teaching Russian language and culture to foreign students. Higher Education Today. Pedagogy. 2020:(8):58–64 (in Russian).
17. Plungyan V.A. Why do we need the National Corpus of the Russian Language? Issues in Linguistics. 2018:(1):7–22 (in Russian).
18. Reshetnikov V.V. Formation of linguocultural competence as a necessary element in teaching Russian as a foreign language. In: New Russia: Traditions and Innovations in Language and Linguistics: Proceedings of the International Conference. Yekaterinburg: Armchair scholar;2016:609–616 (in Russian).
19. Akhmedova A.A. Linguocultural competence as a key aspect of learning foreign languages. Science and Worldview. 2025:(1):45–52 (in Russian).
20. Kosareva L.A. Information Technologies and the Russian National Corpus as Tools for Studying Cultural Concepts in Russian as a Foreign Language Instruction for International Students (Level B2): The Case of “Hospitality” Concepts. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. 2026:19(6):2521– 2528 (in Russian). DOI: 10.30853/phil20260319.
Review
For citations:
Kosareva L.A. Corpus technologies in studying cultural concepts in RFL classes: The concept of happiness. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Pedagogics. Psychology. Philosophy. 2026;(3):72-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-5604-2026-3-72-83
JATS XML








