Electronic Assessments and Their Implementation Feasibility in Iraqi Secondary Education

This study addresses topics related to secondary education and its importance in shaping educational frameworks within secondary schools. It examines how educational methodologies affect academic and practical competencies, the necessity of adapting to rapid developments in educational technology, and the challenges facing education in diverse contexts. The research aimed to evaluate the feasibility of implementing electronic assessments in Iraqi secondary schools, identify technical, human, and economic obstacles, propose practical mechanisms to mitigate these obstacles, and recommend feasible solutions. A quasi-experimental (descriptive-analytical) approach was used to draw conclusions. The research sample consisted of 84 individuals, and the results indicated weaknesses in the technological infrastructure, a shortage of qualified personnel, and security and educational concerns. The study emphasized the importance of diversifying teaching methods and assessment techniques to effectively engage new generations of learners. It critically analyzes the impact of socio-economic factors on educational processes and explores practical solutions to enhance the effectiveness of secondary education. The study highlighted the main challenges related to the three areas addressed: technology: weak infrastructure (electricity, internet) and a shortage of equipment; social factors include resistance to change and weak trust within the educational community; economic factors include high implementation costs (equipment, training, and maintenance). The research focused primarily on the need to integrate modern technology into educational practices to enhance learning experiences and facilitate access to educational resources.

1. Zalessky M.L. Pedagogical Possibilities of Electronic Testing. Educational Technologies (Moscow). 2019: (4): 81–91. Available at: https://rsuh.ru›upload/main/vestnik/niu/niu_1-2023. [Accessed:22.02.2025]. (in English).

2. Hamadneh D. M. A., Kanaan, D. A. F., & Al-Issa, D. R. A. Obstacles to Implementing Electronic Tests in Secondary Schools from the Perspective of Teachers in Jordan. Manar Al-Sharq Journal of Education and Educational Technology; 2025: 4(2): 110–95. Available at: https://doi.org/10.56961/mejeit.v4i2.1083. [Accessed:22.02.2025]. (In Arabic).

3. Drori, I., Zhang, S. J., Shuttleworth, R., Tyser, K., Chin, Z., Lantigua, P., Surbehera, S., Hunter, G., Austin, D., Tang, L., Hicke, Y., Simhon, S., Karnik, S., Granberry, D., & Udell, M. From human days to machine seconds: Automatically answering and generating machine learning final exams. (2023, August 6–10). [Conference session]. 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ‘23), Long Beach, CA, United States. 2023: (29): 3947-3955. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3580305.3599827. [Accessed:15.10.2024]. (In English).

4. Abeywickrama R., Dissanayake T. The validity and reliability of online examinations in the state universities of Sri Lanka: an empirical study. Andalas International Journal of Socio-Humanities; 2022: 4(1): 25–36. (In English).

5. Taan G. H. Model of an e-learning course in computer science, Digital development of the economy and social sphere of the Udmurt Republic: topical issues and the role of higher education: materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Izhevsk: Publishing Center “Udmurt University”. 2019: 247-250. Available at: https://pure.spbu.ru/ws/files/50037533/_.pdf. [Accessed:10.12.2024]. (In Russian).

6. Boyko G., Zotov N., & Poluektov M. Classification and Features of Creating Electronic Tests. Higher Education in Russia; 2008: 12: 127–129. (In Russian).

7. Alyahya D., & Almutairi N. The Impact of Electronic Tests on Students’ Performance Assessment. International Education Studies; 2019: 12(5): 109–119. (In English).

8. الموسوي، عباس هادي عبد السيد. اتجاه طلبة كلية علوم الحاسوب وتكنولوجيا المعلومات نحو الاختبارات الالكترونية وعلاقته بالتحصيل الدراسي.. Al-Mousawi Abbas Hadi Abdul Sayed. The attitude of computer science and information technology students towards electronic tests and its relationship to academic achievement. Lark, 2023: 15(1): 725-695. https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.Vol1.Iss48.2669. [Accessed:01.01.2026]. (In Arabic).

9. Fatima Naaman Abed. The Effectiveness of Two Testing Styles (Electronic and Paper) on the Academic Achievement of Students in the Department of Educational Sciences at Al-Aqsa University. Madarat for Social and Human Sciences; 2023: 3(1): 6–27. Available at: https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/221086. [Accessed: 10.06.2025]. (In Arabic).

10. Kamouka I., El-Din A., Omar A., & El-Hakim A. The extent to which electronic tests can be applied to a sample of secondary school students. Rawak Al-Hikma, 2020: (2): 1–14. Available at: http://dspace.zu.edu.ly/xmlui/handle/1/2973. [Accessed:10.10.2025]. (In Arabic).

11. Suleiman H. M. English Language Teachers’ Attitudes in UNRWA Schools in Damascus Towards Using Electronic Tests in the Assessment Process and the Obstacles to Their Implementation. Damascus University Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences; 2024: 40 (3): 64-86. (In Arabic).

12. Grambovskaya L. V., & Badanina L. A. Problems of remote online testing in mathematics using LMS Moodle. International Research Journal; 2023: 5(131): 72. Available at: https://research-journal.org/en/archive/5-131-2023-may/10.23670/IRJ.2023.131.41. [Accessed: 10.04.2025]. (In Russian).

13. Helal M., & Helal M. A. Exploring Percentages of Elementary School Students Utilizing Visual Electronic Devices for Learning and Homework Assistance. International Journal of Recent Education Research; 2025: 2(2): 70-79. Available at: https://journals.ekb.eg/article_403008_79bdcb06ab46bcca164fca2376dc0e0c.pdf. [Accessed: 05.12.2025]. (In English).

14. Zarei S., & Mohammadi S. Challenges of higher education related to e-learning in developing countries during COVID-19 spread: a review of the perspectives of students, instructors, policymakers, and ICT experts. Environmental Science and Pollution Research; 2022: 29(57): 85562–85568. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-021-14647-2.pdf. [Accessed: 23.01.2024]. (In English).

15. Sinan I. I., Tong,V. V. T., Nwoacha V., Degila J., Onashoga A., Oaihimire I. O., & Ukhurebor K. E. Enhancing Security and Privacy in Educational Environments: A Secure Grade Distribution Scheme with Moodle Integration. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy, and Development; 2024: 8(7): 3737. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.3737. (In English).

16. Sahy S. A., & Al Barazanchi I. I. Exploring the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Electronic Testing Methods in Iraqi Higher Education Institutions: An Empirical Investigation. 11th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI); 2024:159–164. https://doi.org/10.1109/EECSI63442.2024.10776380. (In English).

17. Chen M., Wang Z., Liang L., Ma Z., & Liu Y. Typical practical cases in blended learning. Handbook of Educational Reform through Blended Learning, 2024:425. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6269-3_6. (In English).

18. Gaidelys V., Čiutienė R., Cibulskas G., Miliauskas S., Jukštaitė J., & Dumčiuvienė D. Assessing the socio-economic consequences of distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences: 2024: 12(10): 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100685, (In English).