Prevention of autoaggressive behavior in adolescents at risk of autoaggression: from the work experience of an educational organization
https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-5604-2025-4-138-146
Abstract
This article describes the features of autoaggressive behavior of adolescents at risk of autoaggression, as well as provides data on the results of training work with students.The theoretical basis was the works of Russian and foreign scholars on autoaggressive behavior, frustration, and the digital environment. The study covered 104 respondents, including 39 girls and 65 boys of M. Shaimuratov school No. 104 in Ufa (9th grades, aged 14–15 years). The experimental and control samples included 31 subjects. The inclusion criteria were high and medium risk levels of autoaggressive behavior. The control group consisted of 16 students, and the experimental group consisted of 15 students.
The aim of the study was to identify differences in the manifestation of negative conditions in adolescents, depending on the risk of autoaggression.
The results of an empirical study showed that adolescents with high and moderate levels of autoaggression are characterized by depression, low self-esteem and efficiency. Statistically significant differences in the severity of depressive states provoking autoaggressive behavior were obtained using the Mann-Whitney U-test and the Wilcoxon T-test. It was proven that training activities aimed at improving the mental states of adolescents contributed to significant positive changes in their emotional (regulatory) sphere. The results of the study confirmed the importance of preventing autoaggressive behavior in adolescence.
Keywords
About the Authors
L. G. DmitrievaРоссия
Lyudmila Gennadyevna Dmitrieva, Dr. Sci. (Psychology), Docent, Professor
Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences; Department of General Psychology
Ufa
I. F. Nurmukhametova
Россия
Irina Faskhutovna Nurmukhametova, Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Associate Professor
Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences; Department of General Psychology
Ufa
E. A. Nurmukhametov
Россия
Ernest Albertovich Nurmukhametov, Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Psychologist
Coordination Center for the Development of Active Civic Position in Youth, Prevention Interethnic and Interfaith Conflicts, Countering the Ideology of Terrorism and Preventing Extremism
Ufa
O. I. Politika
Россия
Oksana Ivanovna Politika, Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Associate Professor
Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences; Department of Psychological Support and Clinical Psychology
Ufa
References
1. Freud S. Psychical (Or Mental) Treatment. London: Freeman Press; 2014: 38.
2. Menninger K.A. Psychoanalytic Aspects of suicide. Anthology of Suicidology : Key Articles by Foreign Scientists. 1912-1993. Moscow Kogito-Tsentr Publ.; 2018:37–63 (in Russian).
3. Kaluev A.V. Mechanisms of occurrence of auto-destructive behavior in animals and its classification. Journal of Zoology; 2000:(34):3–10 (in Russian).
4. Rean A.A. Psychology of Personality Study. Saint Petersburg: Publishing house of Mikhailov V.A.; 1999:288 (in Russian).
5. Kurochkina V.E., Vasilieva M.I. Life meaning orientations of adolescents with auto-aggressive behavior. Pedagogy: History, Perspectives; 2021:4 (3):139–148 (in Russian).
6. Ruzhenkov V.A. On the clarification of the content of the concept of “autoaggressive behavior”. Scientific Medical Bulletin of the Central Black Earth Region; 2008:(20–24) (in Russian).
7. Panov V.I., Patrakov E.V. Digitalization of the Information Environment: Risks, Representations, Interactions. Moscow: Psychological Institute RAO; Kursk: University book; 2020:199. (in Russian).
8. Mahler M.S., Gosliner B.J. On symbiotic child psychosis: Genetic, dynamic, and restitutive aspects. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child. 1955:10 (1):195–212.
9. Kharlamenkova N.E., Kumykova E.V., Rubchenko A.K. Psychological Separation: Approaches, Problems, Mechanisms. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2015: 367 (in Russian).
10. Buslaeva E.L. Digitalization of society as a factor of mental and psychosocial development of primary schoolchildren. Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Education and Pedagogical Sciences. 2020:835 (2):159–172 (in Russian).
11. Karpov A.V., Voronova A.T. Digitalization and development of the child’s psyche: challenges of the new time. Human Capital; 2021:(8):22–28 (in Russian).
12. Soldatova G.V., Rasskazova E.I. Psychological models of digital competence of russian adolescents and parents. National Psychological Journal. 2014:(2):25–31 (in Russian).
13. Soldatova G.V., Rasskazova E.I., Vishneva A.E., et al. Born Digital: Family Context and Cognitive Development. Moscow: Akropol; 2022:337. (in Russian).
14. Soldatova G.V., Rasskazova E.I., Nestik T.A. Digital Generation of Russia: Competence and Security. Moscow: Smysl; 2017:375 (in Russian).
15. Bolshunova N.Ya. System digitalization of education in the modern world: Risks and prospects for human development. Human Development in the Modern World. 2021:7–16 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Dmitrieva L.G., Nurmukhametova I.F., Nurmukhametov E.A., Politika O.I. Prevention of autoaggressive behavior in adolescents at risk of autoaggression: from the work experience of an educational organization. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Pedagogics. Psychology. Philosophy. 2025;(4):138-146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-5604-2025-4-138-146
JATS XML








