Developing intercultural communication skills in Russian language instruction in Kyrgyz schools: Ethnocultural studies component
https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-5604-2025-4-127-137
Abstract
In multinational Kyrgyzstan, Russian functions as a central tool for intercultural interaction. Teaching it in educational settings promotes respectful attitudes toward cultural pluralism, nurtures tolerance, and strengthens interethnic communication. The ethnocultural dimension, when embedded in Russian language instruction, is particularly significant. This article outlines theoretical bases of intercultural communication, examines the role of Russian in a multicultural context, and offers school-based examples of effective ethnocultural pedagogy. The analysis indicates that incorporating ethnocultural materials into Russian lessons helps students acquire intercultural communicative skills. For Kyrgyz students, this is not only a way to master the language of interethnic communication, but also an opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the cultural codes, traditions, and values of both their own people and other ethnic groups. The paper explores how the ethnocultural component affects Russian language acquisition and its importance for developing tolerant, open interethnic relations. Pedagogical strategies, cultural traits, and social conditions that foster fruitful intercultural dialogue are examined. It also highlights the role of ethnocultural content in teaching Russian as a foreign language, stressing the value of familiarizing learners with Russian and Kyrgyz cultural practices and traditions to build language proficiency and intercultural competence. The author also concludes in the article that a systematic approach to implementing the intercultural aspect in the school curriculum is necessary, which will prepare students for life in a multicultural environment and ensure the harmonious coexistence of various ethnic communities.
Keywords
About the Author
A. E. ErnisovaКыргызстан
Aigerim Ernisovna Ernisova, Cand. Sci. (Philology), Deputy Director at the Institute
A. O. Orusbaev Russian Language Institute
Bishkek
References
1. Sadokhin A.P. Introduction to the theory of intercultural communication. Educational allowance. Moscow: KIORUS; 2014:152 (in Russian).
2. Sheiman L. A. Fundamentals of Methods of Teaching Russian Literature in Kyrgyz Schools. Part 2: Course Contents. Language Base. Ethnocultural Aspects. Frunze: Mektep; 1982:47 (in Russian).
3. Manlikova M.Kh. Ethnocultural analysis of a literary text. Bishkek, 2014:22. (in Russian).
4. Manlikova M. Kh. Colors of the seasons. Ethnocultural study guide on the development of Russian speech. Bishkek: KRSU, 2012:63 (in Russian).
5. Gachev G.D. Mentality of the peoples of the world. Kyrgyzstan. Moscow, 2000:231 (in Russian).
6. Toychueva J.R. Followed by “Umay-ene”. India and Kyrgyzstan: interaction of civilizations (140<sup>th</sup> anniversary of Rabindranath Tagore). Material of the international scientific conference. Ch. 2. Osh, 2001:240–243 (in Russian).
7. Tagaev M.J., Simonova O.G. I need Russian language. Bishkek, 2022:61. (in Russian).
8. Alefirenko N.F. Linguoculturology : dictionary-reference book. Moscow: Flinta; 2010:117 (in Russian).
9. Yudakhin K.K. Kirghiz-Russian Dictionary. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia; 1965. (in Russian).
10. Abdrazakova G.Sh. The concept of “yurt” in the Kyrgyz linguistic picture of the world. Bulletin of Science and Practice. 2022:8(6):799-800. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kontsept-yurta-v-kirgizskoy-yazykovoy-kartine-mira/viewer (accessed: 05 December 2025) (in Russian).
11. Rysbaeva G.K. Ethnolinguistics of cult phraseology in Turkic languages (based on materials from Kazakh and Kyrgyz languages) : philological. scientific. doc. dis. Bishkek, 2017:62 (in Kyrgyz).
12. Nizovskaya I.A. Critical Thinking Development Through Reading and Writing Program Vocabulary. A Teaching Aid. Bishkek: OFCIR; 2003:32–33 (in Russian).
13. Ignatova I.B., Legochkina E.N., Goncharova A.V. Intercultural communication in the process of teaching the Russian language. Bulletin of Omsk State Pedagogical University. 2021:121 (in Russian).
14. Shalygina N.A. The role of L.A. Sheiman’s ethnocultural approach in the methodology of teaching Russian literature in national schools. Russian language abroad. Special issue. Russian Studies of Kyrgyzstan. Moscow, 2022:46 (in Russian).
15. Subject Standard “Russian Language in Schools with Kyrgyz, Uzbek, and Tajik Languages of Instruction for Grades 5–11 of General Education Organizations of the Kyrgyz Republic.” Bishkek; 2022:42–43 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Ernisova A.E. Developing intercultural communication skills in Russian language instruction in Kyrgyz schools: Ethnocultural studies component. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Pedagogics. Psychology. Philosophy. 2025;(4):127-137. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-5604-2025-4-127-137
JATS XML








