Modeling the process of student learning activities

Meta-subject competencies, such as self-organization and self-regulation of student learning, are becoming key in modern education. The aim of this study was to model the student learning process and its components. A comparative analysis of the concepts of self-organization and self-regulation, identifying their similarities and differences in key aspects, was conducted within the framework of the research topic. A survey of students in Omsk and Bishkek was conducted to develop the models. Respondents’ rights were protected by the anonymity of the survey procedure. A cognitive Student Learning Activity Model was developed using a cognitive approach. This cognitive approach incorporated expert methods, graph theory, and other methods. An analysis of scientific data showed that self-organization creates a framework for learning activity. Self-regulation, in turn, ensures the subject’s cognitive activity within this framework. This approach allows students to flexibly respond to emerging difficulties. Student self-assessments of selforganization differ by 6–7% between the samples of Russian and Kyrgyz students. These differences may be due to differences in mentalities and educational systems. The results of the simplicial analysis revealed that the implicit factors influencing student learning are the “assessment” and “control” factors of educational procedures. These factors are elements of self-regulation of learning. The simplices with the largest number of elements, the “psychological maturity” and “reflection” factors of the student, are also elements of selfregulation of learning. Experts advise educators to consider these factors in educational activities and the rationale for management decisions.

1. Kondaurova O.P., Shasharina D.S. Self-organization as a factor in the success of educational activities. Tendencii razvitija nauki i obrazovanija. 2020;67(3):25–28 (in Russian).

2. Kishikov R.V., Kononov A.N. Self-organization of students’ educational activities in a digital educational environment. Vestnik of Sate University of Humanities and Technology. 2022;(1):10–113 (in Russian).

3. Petrova T.N. Self-organization of students as a tool for increasing the effectiveness of innovative and research activities of higher education institutions. In: Traditions and Innovations in national education systems: Proceedings of the international conference (2020). Ufa: M. Akmulla Bashkir State Teacher Training University, 2021:172–178 (in Russian).

4. Morosanova V.I. Conscious self-regulation as a meta-resource for achieving goals and resolving life problems. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 14. Psihologija. 2021;(1):3–37 (in Russian).

5. Morosanova V.I, Fomina G.G, Filippova Ye.V. Conscious self-regulation, school engagement, and quality of teaching as resources for subjective well-being and academic performance of students. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psihologija. 2025;48 (1):55–77 (in Russian).

6. Andreeva A.D., Lisichkina A.G., Morosanova V.I. Conscious self-regulation and readiness for self-realization in adolescence. Theoretical and experimental Psychology. 2024;17(4):165–182 (in Russian).

7. Fomina T.G., Filippova Ye.V., Morosanova V.I. Conscious self-regulation and school involvement as resources for students’ subjective well-being. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye issledovaniya. 2024;16(3):156– 173 (in Russian).

8. Lozhnikov A.E., Marenko V.A. Self-regulation of student learning activities: a cognitive approach. In: GraphiCon-2023: Proceedings of the 33d international conference on computer graphics and machine vision (2024). Omsk: OmGTU, 024:1003-1009 (in Russian).

9. Zimmerman B.J. Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice. 2002;41(2):64-70.

10. Anzola D., Barbrook-Johnson P., Cano J.I. Self-organization and social science. Comput Math Organ Theory. 2017;(23):221–257.

11. Maruf H., Juhaidi A. Multigroup analysis of Islamic Higher Education and General Higher Education in Indonesia: the influence of family socioeconomic background, possibility of success, and self-efficacy on student academic performance with resilience as a mediator. Cogent Education. 2025; 12(1).

12. Wong J., Baars M., He M., et. al. Facilitating goal setting and planning to enhance online self-regulation of learning. Computers in Human Behavior. 2021;(124):106913.

13. Abren G.T., Negasi R.D., Abebe A.S. Exploring the mediating role of dimensions of academic task engagement in the relationship among student-teacher relationship, academic task value, and positive development outcomes. Cogent Psychology. 2025;12(1):77-81.

14. Ishkov A.D. Student’s educational activity: Psychological and wholistic factors of success. Moscow: FLINTA; 2019:224 (in Russian).

15. Toporkova Ye.S. Conditions for experience of self-organbization of students during educational activities. In.: Obrazovatel’noye prostranstvo v informatsionnuyu epokhu: Proceedings of the conference, Moscow, 08 June 2021. Moscow: Institute of strategic development of education; 2021:497–504 (in Russian).