The evolution of corporate learning: from traditional forms to digital platforms
https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-5604-2025-2-21-32
Abstract
The article examines the evolution of corporate learning, analyzes the transition from traditional forms to digital platforms in the context of global digital transformation. The relevance of the topic is due to the need for companies to adapt to technological changes, where the development of human capital is becoming a key factor in competitiveness. According to LinkedIn data, 94% of employees are willing to remain loyal to their employer while investing in their professional growth, which underscores the importance of modern educational solutions. However, traditional teaching methods based on face-to-face lectures and standardized trainings are inferior to digital platforms that provide flexibility, personalization, and continuity of skill acquisition. The purpose of the work is to identify patterns of transformation of corporate learning, to identify pedagogical principles and factors contributing to the integration of digital tools (AI, VR/AR, LMS systems) into educational processes. Based on historical analysis, four stages of evolution have been identified: from behaviorist methods of the mid-20th century to connectivist models using adaptive technologies. The economic, technological and social aspects of the transition to digital forms, including the growth of the e-learning market, are considered. The practical significance of the work lies in the development of recommendations for the design of hybrid learning models combining digital tools with live interaction, investments in digital literacy and ethical audit of algorithms. The prospects of the study are related to the analysis of the impact of metaverses and generative AI on corporate education, as well as a long-term assessment of the relevance of digital tools in changing labor markets. The research results can be used by HR specialists to optimize educational programs and by teachers to integrate technologies into pedagogical design.
About the Authors
N. N. SivtsevRussian Federation
SIVTSEV Nikolay Nikolaevich – 1st year Master’s Student, Corporate e-learning, Department of Digital and Technological Education, Teacher Training Institute
Yakutsk
N. Y. Tulasynova
Russian Federation
TULASYNOVA Nadezhda Yurievna – Cand. Sci. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor
Yakutsk
References
1. Global Market Insights Inc. The official website of Global Market Insights Inc. Available at: https://www.gminsights.com/ru/industry-analysis/corporate-elearning-market (Accessed: 24 April 2025).
2. Knowles M.S., Holton III E.E., Swanson R.A. The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. 6th edition. London, New York, etc.: ELSEVIER Butterworth Heinemann, 2005:378.
3. Siemens D. Connectivism: a theory of learning for the digital age. Interactive education. 2018;6:50–55.
4. McDonald’s. The official website of McDonald’s [online resource]. Available at L: https://corporate.mcdonalds.com/corpmcd/home.html (Аccessed: 26 April 2025).
5. Rudina T.D. E-learning as a method of corporate learning. Bulletin of Science. 2024;4(11):213–223 (in Russian).
6. Walmart Inc. Available at: https://corporate.walmart.com/content/corporate/en_us/search-results.q=Employee%20Training%20Programs.html (Accessed: 28.04.2025).
7. Seitkazieva N.S., Toktogulova G.A., Ibraeva AT. The introduction of gamification elements into the educational process. Bulletin of the International University of Kyrgyzstan. 2021;(1(42)):131–136 (in Russian).
8. Yarushkin V.A. Development of online platforms for training and competence development within the framework of corporate training. In: Philosophy in the XX century: socio-philosophical problems of modern science and technology: Proceedings of the 1 st International Scientific and Practical Conference, Moscow, Zelenograd, Krasnoyarsk, May 12, 2023*. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University; 2023:416–420 (in Russian). EDN XRIZFT.
9. Isaeva E.U. Modern LMS distance learning platforms: analysis and comparison. Pedagogy. Questions of theory and practice. 2021;6(6):1045–1050 (in Russian). DOI: 10.30853/ped20210127.
10. Itinson K.S. Connectivism is learning in the digital age. Baltic Humanitarian Journal. 2021;10(4):96–98 (in Russian). DOI: 10.26140/bgz3-2021-1004-0021.
11. Shurygin V.U. Electronic learning management systems in academic and corporate education. The azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology. 2021;10(2):335–338 (in Russian). DOI: 10.26140/anip-2021-1002-0085.
12. Oskina A.N., Darinskaya L.A. Trends in e-learning research in Asia (using Singapore, Japan, and the Republic of Korea as examples). The world of science. Pedagogy and psychology. 2021;9(1) (in Russian).
13. Volokitin Yu.I., Grinko O.V., Kupriyanovsky V.P., et al. Digital twins of knowledge and ontology for higher technological education. International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2021;9(1):128–144.
14. Galyamov A.E., Otyokina N.E. Information educational platforms. APK: innovative technologies. 2022;(1):34–38 (in Russian). DOI: 10.35524/2687-0436_2022_01_34.
15. Ryazantseva M.V. Hybrid learning model: innovations and traditions. Bulletin of Pedagogical Sciences. 2024;(2):53–58 (in Russian). DOI: 10.62257/2687-1661-2024-2-53-58.
Review
For citations:
Sivtsev N.N., Tulasynova N.Y. The evolution of corporate learning: from traditional forms to digital platforms. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Pedagogics. Psychology. Philosophy. 2025;(2):21-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-5604-2025-2-21-32