The influence of the poetic perception of the world on its philosophical understanding
Abstract
The Martin Heidegger’s thesis that poets, not scholars or politicians, are at the forefront of humanity is considered. Since poetry plays an important role in the history of mankind, the arguments “for” and “against” are considered. Even the Antiquity demonstrated outstanding examples of poetic creativity and attempts to comprehend it using the methods of philology and philosophy. For example, Aristotle had special works devoted to this problem. In modern times, each literary movement proclaimed its manifestos, which are considered for romanticism, symbolism, and acmeism. Poetry is traditionally closely related to philosophy. There were poets gravitating towards philosophy and philosophers of a poetic orientation. The former includes Novalis, the latter – Fichte and Schelling. This is typical, first of all, for the era of romanticism, to a lesser extent for symbolism and some other trends. The article shows how the desire for balances and their limits is growing in poetic creativity. The main contours of the methodology for the study of poetic thought are outlined. Its core is the formation of a quasi-equilibrium cell, which makes it possible to ensure the interaction of a poetic work with the limiting dynamic equilibria of the cognition process. They are provided by identification, communication and rhythmization, the elementary processes of self-organization, which step by step form their phenomena, horizons and basic rhythms that form these cells. The formation of phenomenal boundaries occurs on the basis of identification marks that can emerge from memory as elements or structures of knowledge acquired long ago or for other reasons and have not yet found application. One can only partially agree with the statement about the avant-garde role of the poet. The role of the poet and the poetically thinking philosopher is enormous and in some cases can really be decisive. However, there must be a certain set of circumstances for this to happen. In other situations, the scientist or philosopher comes to the fore. In the XX and XXI centuries. many trends and approaches have been mixed and more research is required in each case.
Keywords
poetic work,
philosophy,
phenomenon,
horizon,
reference rhythm,
identification,
methodology,
romanticism,
symbolism,
acmeism
About the Author
N. N. Kozhevnikov
М.K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
KOZHEVNIKOV Nikolay N.– Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor of Philosophy
Yakutsk
References
1. Skirbekk G., Gil’e P. Istorija filosofii. Per. s angl. – M.: VLADOS, 2001, 800 s.
2. Hajdegger M. Pis’mo o gumanizme v kn. Vremja i bytie. Per. s nem. – M.: Respublika, 1993 – S. 192-220.
3. Jekkerman I.P. Razgovory s Gete v poslednie gody ego zhizni. Per. s nem. – M.: Hudozhestvennaja literatura, 1981, 687 s.
4. Rassel B. Istorija zapadnoj filosofii v 2 t. T. 2 Per. s angl. – Novosibirsk: Izd. Novosibirskogo universiteta, 1994 – 400 s.
5. Russo Zh.-Zh. Ispoved’. Progulki odinokogo mechtatelja. Sb.: Per. s fran. – M.: Pushkinskaja biblioteka, Izdatel’stvo «AST», 2004 – 884 s.
6. Shlegel’ F. Literaturnaja teorija nemeckogo romantizma. Per. s nem. – L., 1934 S. 172
7. Zarubezhnaja literatura XIX veka. Romantizm. Hrestomatija – M.: Prosveshhenie, 1976 – 512 s.
8. Shelling F. Sochinenija v 2 t. T. 2. Per. s nem. – M.: Mysl’, 1989 – 636 s.
9. Reale Dzh., Antiseri D. Zapadnaja filosofija ot istokov do nashih dnej. T. 4 Ot romantizma do nashih dnej – SPb.: Petropolis, 1997 – 880 s.
10. Trifonov I.A. Russkaja literatura HH stoletija. Dooktjabr’skij period. Hrestomatija – M.: Prosveshhenie, 1980 – 640 s.
11. Brjusov V.Ja. Kljuchi tajn. V kn.: Ot simvolizma do Oktjabrja – M.: 1924 – S. 45-47.
12. Merezhkovskij D.S. O prichinah upadka i o novyh techenijah sovremennoj russkoj literatury –SPb.: Nauka, 2007.
13. Gumilev N.S. Nasledie simvolizma i akmeizm. V kn.: Ot simvolizma do Oktjabrja – M.: 1924 – S. 86-89.
14. Odoevceva I.V. Na beregah Nevy. Literaturnye memuary – M.: Hudozhestvennaja literatura, 1989 – 334 s.
15. Gadamer H.-G. Istina i metod. Osnovy filosofskoj germenevtiki. Per. s nem. – M.: Progress, 1988 – 704 s.
16. Annenskij I. Izbrannye proizvedenija – L.: Hudozhestvennaja literatura, 1988 – 736 s.
17. Zaharchenko E.G. Pojet i obraz pojeta. XIX vek. V kn. «Ot filosofii zhizni k filosofii kul’tury – SPb.: Aletejja, 2001 – S. 238-257.
18. Prigozhin I.R. Ot sushhestvujushhego k voznikajushhemu. Vremja i slozhnost’ v fizicheskih naukah. Per. s angl. – M.: Nauka, 1985 – 328 s.
Review
For citations:
Kozhevnikov N.N. The influence of the poetic perception of the world on its philosophical understanding. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Pedagogics. Psychology. Philosophy. 2023;(2):78-85. (In Russ.)
Views:
123
Email this article 