Preview

Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Pedagogics. Psychology. Philosophy

Advanced search

Characteristics of a dialogue in the modern world

Abstract

The article considers the issue of the dialogue’s essence, which is still relevant, as its essential characteristics have not been considered yet. The author assumes that the essential part of a dialogue is an ontological base that reveals itself in all forms of the dialogue relations. Moreover, this base reveals itself in pseudo-dialogical forms of the dialogical intercourse. The absence of a true dialogue does not allow individuals, cultures, and civilizations to understand each other. The defining criterion for presence of such a level is creative activity of parties in a dialogue. The deep level exists as a stable cycle of fluctuations between self-identification and communication, allowing the dialogue to realize its functions. The article discusses the main contradictions of the dialogue, the complexity of its implementation in the modern world in the context of globalization and global problems of our time. The complexity and inconsistency of modern processes makes this form of communication more accessible and at the same time more complex. In today’s world, the need for the dialogue is increasing. This makes the personal principle in communication more relevant. The article considers the history of the dialogue culture from its early form as the art of argument to the understanding of its heuristic possibilities as a form of dialectical conversation, in which the question is more important than the answers.

About the Author

E. N. Popov
Северо-Восточный федеральный университет им. М.К. Аммосова
Russian Federation


References

1. Prigozhin A.I. Dialogicheskie resheniya // ONS: Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. – 2004. – №3. – S. 51-60.

2. YAspers Karl. Smysl i naznachenie istorii: Per. s nem.– M.: Politizdat, 1991.–527 s.

3. Lifinceva T.P. Filosofiya dialoga M. Bubera. – M.: IFRAN, – 1999.-133 s.

4. SHCHukin V.G. O dialoge i ego al’ternativah. Variacii na temu M.M. Bahtina. // Voprosy filosofii. – 2006. – № 7.-S.32-44.

5. Popov, B.N. Metodologicheskij status drugogo v filosofii M.M. Bahtina // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 7. Filosofiya. – 2003. – №4. – S. 17-25

6. Bahtin M.M. K filosofii postupka. // Filosofiya i sociologiya nauki i tekhniki. Ezhegodnik. 1984-1985; M., 1986. – S.80-160

7. Popov B.N. Etika. Kurs lekcij. – M.: Academia, 1999. – 187 s.

8. Marks K. Sociologiya. – M.: Nika Press, 2000 – 431 s.

9. Zykova A.B. Problema obshcheniya v filosofii M. de Unamuno. // Istoriya filosofii M.1997 – №1 – S. 6 – 22

10. Percev, A.V. Vrachuyushchaya psihologiya K. YAspersa. //Zapadnaya filosofiya. Itogi tysyacheletiya. Ekaterinburg; Bishkek: 1997. – S. 5-15.

11. Portnov A.N. YAzyk i soznanie: Osnovnye paradigmy issledovaniya problemy v filosofii 19-20 vv. – Ivanovo: Ivanovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. 1994. – 370 s.


Review

For citations:


Popov E.N. Characteristics of a dialogue in the modern world. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Pedagogics. Psychology. Philosophy. 2022;(2):94-100. (In Russ.)

Views: 205


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5604 (Online)